Saturday, February 22, 2020

Political Economy - Neo-Liberalism vs. Classic Liberalism Essay

Political Economy - Neo-Liberalism vs. Classic Liberalism - Essay Example Neo-liberalism aimed to prevent and control monopoly situations such that if there are no bodies in the state of power that can execute the law to preserve the innocent and restrain the offenders, anyone in the state of nature may punish another person for any evil he or that he or she has done since neo-liberalism supports equality. It ensures that there is no superiority or jurisdiction over one another. Contrary, classic liberalism promotes monopoly of power by removing the free exercise of human ingenuity. Classic liberalism argues that when man was denied the free exercise, man became rapidly able to satisfy ever-widening range of desires. Classic liberalism emphasizes that, only the government that holds the enormous control of any good or evil in the society and man should not take law in their hands (Friedrich 2-5). Classic liberalism holds that there is nothing in the basic principle of liberalism to deter making changes on the law of nature. It emphasizes that there are no fixed rules fixed finally such that these rules cannot be reversed or changed. Fixed rules are regarded to be ineffective and confer immediate and obvious benefits only on some people since it has a strong favors to certain people. Neo-liberalism does not encourage the concept of individualism. It emphasizes that on has the authority to destroy another person who ought to do harm to the society although no man is supposed to harm another innocent man. One has to try as much as possible to try to preserve the rest of humankind from any evil that can happen to the other people. Neo-liberalism emphasizes that all being are equal and independent and no man is supposed to harm each other’s innocent life, health or possession as it recognizes all being as workmanship of on omnipotent (God). Moreover, no man that has the liberty to destroy himself and man should not have more than other hence encourage sharing such thing as power. For

Wednesday, February 5, 2020

Summarizing Four Articles Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Summarizing Four Articles - Essay Example Similarly, reducing the abuse and use of drugs cannot solely be achieved by the efforts of the department of health alone, but requires the integration of the political players, the public health and those in the public policy to establish an integrated approach that can be applied to face the problem of drugs (Tarantola, 1). The national drug problem cannot also be addressed through the establishment of good drug treatment and rehabilitation services, since even though such efforts might help to address the problem of those who are already addicted to drug use, the approach does less to prevent the use of drugs by those who have not yet started using drugs (Reuter and Pollack, 341). The combined efforts of the police and the researchers in social crimes is an important concept towards addressing social crimes such as vandalism, drug and alcohol use, owing to the fact that such combined efforts serve as complimentary efforts that makes identifying and alleviating social crimes much e asier, than when the police department is left to address the crimes on its own (Baker and Wolfer, 47). According to the article, â€Å"Community Governance an Organized Approach to Fighting Crime†, by Joe Reiss, the police department on its own cannot be able to fight social crimes effectively, while the adoption of the community policing strategy either, may not be too helpful (Reiss, 8). The City of Anaheim in California is a good example of how the integrated efforts of the police, community policing and other city departments can help address social crimes. In this city, the combined efforts of the police, community preservation department, the public works department, the utilities department and the office of the attorney, reinforced by the community policing efforts made it possible to reduce the social neighborhood crimes by almost 80% in the 2000s (Reiss, 9). Through increased coordination and